<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ames&#8217; Federal Theology</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.meetthepuritans.com/2009/09/23/ames-federal-theology/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.meetthepuritans.com/2009/09/23/ames-federal-theology/</link>
	<description>It&#039;s a Seventeenth Century World</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 21:12:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rich Barcellos</title>
		<link>http://www.meetthepuritans.com/2009/09/23/ames-federal-theology/comment-page-1/#comment-207</link>
		<dc:creator>Rich Barcellos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Sep 2009 02:02:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.meetthepuritans.com/?p=558#comment-207</guid>
		<description>Ames said, “9. Freedom comes, first, in doing away with government by law, or the intermixture of the covenant of works, which held the ancient people in a certain bondage” (Ames, The Marrow of Theology, 206 (XXXVIII:9)). This seems to illustrate a form of the abrogation of the CW.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ames said, “9. Freedom comes, first, in doing away with government by law, or the intermixture of the covenant of works, which held the ancient people in a certain bondage” (Ames, The Marrow of Theology, 206 (XXXVIII:9)). This seems to illustrate a form of the abrogation of the CW.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Jones</title>
		<link>http://www.meetthepuritans.com/2009/09/23/ames-federal-theology/comment-page-1/#comment-206</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Jones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 22:36:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.meetthepuritans.com/?p=558#comment-206</guid>
		<description>Indeed. If I was going to my Presbytery next week I could have asked van Vliet about it, but, alas, I will be overseas.  Thanks for putting me on to that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Indeed. If I was going to my Presbytery next week I could have asked van Vliet about it, but, alas, I will be overseas.  Thanks for putting me on to that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rich Barcellos</title>
		<link>http://www.meetthepuritans.com/2009/09/23/ames-federal-theology/comment-page-1/#comment-205</link>
		<dc:creator>Rich Barcellos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 22:10:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.meetthepuritans.com/?p=558#comment-205</guid>
		<description>I found it in Jan van Vliet, “Decretal Theology and the Development of Covenant Thought: An Assessment of Cornelis Graafland’s Thesis with a Particular View to Federal Architects William Ames and Johannes Cocceius,” WTJ 63 (2001): 416.

Ames held to what van Vliet calls “a form of [the progressive] abrogation of the covenant of works” (van Vliet, “Decretal Theology and the Development of Covenant Thought,” 418). Cocceius was Ames&#039; student. It is an interesting proposal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I found it in Jan van Vliet, “Decretal Theology and the Development of Covenant Thought: An Assessment of Cornelis Graafland’s Thesis with a Particular View to Federal Architects William Ames and Johannes Cocceius,” WTJ 63 (2001): 416.</p>
<p>Ames held to what van Vliet calls “a form of [the progressive] abrogation of the covenant of works” (van Vliet, “Decretal Theology and the Development of Covenant Thought,” 418). Cocceius was Ames&#8217; student. It is an interesting proposal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Jones</title>
		<link>http://www.meetthepuritans.com/2009/09/23/ames-federal-theology/comment-page-1/#comment-204</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Jones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 21:26:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.meetthepuritans.com/?p=558#comment-204</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know; that&#039;s an interesting idea. Who suggested it? Cocceius&#039; progressive abrogations was both redemptive-historical and existential. I assume you are talking about the redemptive-historical aspect?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know; that&#8217;s an interesting idea. Who suggested it? Cocceius&#8217; progressive abrogations was both redemptive-historical and existential. I assume you are talking about the redemptive-historical aspect?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rich Barcellos</title>
		<link>http://www.meetthepuritans.com/2009/09/23/ames-federal-theology/comment-page-1/#comment-202</link>
		<dc:creator>Rich Barcellos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 21:09:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.meetthepuritans.com/?p=558#comment-202</guid>
		<description>Great stuff! Do you think there is a seed-form of the progressive abrogation of the covenant of works in Ames? This has been suggested and that Cocceius further developed Ames on this point.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great stuff! Do you think there is a seed-form of the progressive abrogation of the covenant of works in Ames? This has been suggested and that Cocceius further developed Ames on this point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rediscovering God in America &#124; Christwire &#171; Religion</title>
		<link>http://www.meetthepuritans.com/2009/09/23/ames-federal-theology/comment-page-1/#comment-200</link>
		<dc:creator>Rediscovering God in America &#124; Christwire &#171; Religion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 07:13:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.meetthepuritans.com/?p=558#comment-200</guid>
		<description>[...] Ames&#039; Federal Theology &#124; Meet The Puritans [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Ames&#39; Federal Theology | Meet The Puritans [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

