The Two Parts of Seminary Education
Posted on 29. Oct, 2009 by Danny Hyde in John Owen, Thomas Goodwin
Quick. What should be the two constituent parts of a Reformed theological education? Theology and exegesis? Philosophy and theology? Systematic and practical theology? Good guesses. On July 2, 1651 the Commissioners of the University of Dublin sent a letter to John Owen addressing this issue. Their desire was for Owen and Thomas Goodwin to review the University’s laws, rules, orders, and constitutions and give their advice on how to better the institution.
Here is where this short letter gets interesting. The Commissioners described their desire for their University and the training of men for the ministry in these words:
Wherein we desire that the educating of youth in the knowledge of God and the principles of piety may be in the first place promoted, experience having taught that where learning is attained before the work of grace upon the heart, it serves only to make a sharper opposition against the power of godliness (The Correspondence of John Owen, ed. Peter Toon, 50–51).
The two constituent parts that these Commissioners desired for a thoroughly Reformed and Puritan education were theology and piety. That sounded so odd to me as I read this letter, since I have been conditioned by our current theological training system in which what is emphasized is the school you go to (Westminster CA v. Westminster PA, RTS–Jackson v. Covenant, etc.), the degree you earn, the GPA you receive, your GRE score if you desire to go to grad school in a University, and the amount of reading you have done. Our current system is utterly focused on knowledge—systematics, biblical theology, exegesis, history, etc.
The Commissioners of the University of Dublin were on to something, though. Their experience taught them the necessity of piety in training students. What is interesting is how they qualify what they meant by piety: “where learning is attained before the work of grace upon the heart, it serves only to make a sharper opposition against the power of godliness.” Seminary students need to be born again, they need to be converted, and they need to have experienced the power of grace in their souls. Is it any different today?
3 Responses to “The Two Parts of Seminary Education”
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.

JC
29. Oct, 2009
Do you think the Commissioners were satisfied with the birth of grace in a man’s heart, or did they seek mature grace?
Danny Hyde
29. Oct, 2009
Good question. I would assume they are speaking of regeneration in its narrow sense, meaning, men who are born again, but also in its broadest sense, that is, those who are living in a state of grace.
Charles L. Baker
31. Oct, 2009
I would add a third: Liturgics, an overview of historic church texts and practices in worship.